Boztek

AI safety advocates tell founders to slow down

At the TechCrunch Disrupt 2024 event, three advocates for AI safety highlighted the critical need for caution among startup founders in the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence. Sarah Myers West, co-executive director of the AI Now Institute, expressed concern about the overwhelming push to release new AI technologies without thorough consideration of the long-term ethical implications. She emphasized that startups should not only aim to innovate but also contemplate the societal impacts of their products and the future they are helping to shape.

The urgency for responsible AI deployment is underscored by recent tragic events, including a lawsuit against Character.AI by the family of a child who reportedly died by suicide, claiming the chatbot played a role in that tragedy. Myers West pointed out that the swift introduction of AI solutions can perpetuate long-standing issues, such as content moderation and online abuse. This case exemplifies the serious consequences of rushing AI technology into the public sphere without adequate safeguards.

Moreover, the potential negative repercussions of AI extend to various domains, including the spread of misinformation and copyright violations. Jingna Zhang, founder of the artist-centric platform Cara, articulated the profound influence AI systems can have on individuals’ lives. She stressed the necessity for implementing protective measures during product development, particularly in light of controversies involving platforms like Meta, which utilize public user posts to enhance their AI models. For artists, this policy threatens their livelihoods, as their publicly shared works could inadvertently contribute to the very technology that could undermine their careers. Zhang emphasized the essential role of copyright in safeguarding artists’ rights and highlighted the disconnect between traditional copyright norms and the current practices surrounding generative AI.

Aleksandra Pedraszewska from ElevenLabs, a leading voice cloning company, echoed the sentiment of responsibility in AI development. In her role as head of safety, she underscores the importance of “red-teaming” – rigorously testing and anticipating undesirable outcomes from new AI technologies. With ElevenLabs boasting over 33 million users, Pedraszewska recognized the direct impact that product changes can have on a substantial user base and the necessity of maintaining stringent ethical standards to prevent misuse, such as non-consensual deepfakes.

Pedraszewska advocates for a balanced approach to regulation, emphasizing the need for a middle ground that respects both innovation and safety. She insists that AI practitioners need to actively engage with the user community, understanding their concerns and incorporating feedback to create safer products.

The discussions at TechCrunch Disrupt 2024 reflect a growing awareness in the tech industry about the challenges presented by AI. The advocates warn that while the excitement surrounding AI offers immense potential for societal advancement, it is equally essential to proceed with thoughtfulness and integrity. Moving too quickly can lead to unintended consequences that not only haunt users but also tarnish the reputation of the very technological advancements being heralded as the future.

The dialogue revolving around AI safety is becoming increasingly visible, prompting key questions about responsibility, ethical considerations, and societal impacts. Startups and tech companies must grapple with their role in shaping the governance of AI technologies while balancing the driving forces of innovation and societal welfare.

In conclusion, as the AI landscape continues to evolve at a swift pace, advocates urge startups to adopt a more measured approach, emphasizing the need for ethical foresight in product development. By adopting precautionary measures and fostering a community-centric dialogue, the industry can work towards a future where technological advancements serve the greater good without compromising safety and ethical standards.



Leave a Reply